Melbourne – now the most livable city in the world – and its cycling Director of Design, Rob Adams


Rob Adams, Melbourne’s Director of Design

Melbourne, now deemed the most livable city in the world, has bumped Vancouver from top spot. Never having believed Vancouver deserved that spot, I’m happy the designation has gone to a city that probably does.

Interestingly Melbourne has a “Director of Design” at its City Hall, whereas we have a “Director of Planning.” Language usually means something, if you know what I mean. While we have made a few interesting moves lately, it is still unclear what we are planning here, and some accelerating crises are going ignored.

Melbourne’s post is held by the renowned Rob Adams, who was interviewed by the CBC recently while he was visiting Vancouver. A small excerpt from that talk is transcribed below, but it’s worth listening to the whole audio clip. Thanks to Open File for extracting the audio. It’s also worth taking a look at this article on Adams:

“For Adams, the future is not a vision of interlocking mega-towers, nor is it a mega-sprawl. For the City of Melbourne’s current planning strategy, Melbourne 2030, Adams confidently details how the city can accommodate up to 5 million people by 2029 without expanding. He describes the concept as the ‘7.5 per cent city’: a network of ‘activity centres’ located along existing high-functioning transport routes featuring residential buildings between four and eight storeys high, which, over time, will become vibrant mini-versions of central Melbourne.”

Compare Adams’ vision to what’s happening here. We may have made some progress in the bicycle and transit department lately, despite some 1950s-style dinosaurs fighting bike lanes (who incidentally drive me absolutely around the bend. What century are we in?). But in terms of general urban design, we are still doing very badly. A dire property speculation crisis and a City Hall under a stranglehold by vision-less developers (these two things are not unrelated) are both serious impediments to our doing anything as thoughtful here as they’re doing in Melbourne. And those benefitting are the ones blocking change. For obvious reasons.

Melbourne’s Rob Adams on livability and cycling infrastructure by eatoutsidethebox

CBC interview excerpt:

Rob Adams: We’ve got the same issues I suspect you have [in Vancouver] – the road space is given up begrudgingly to bicycles. Our challenge now is to get a quality bike route where you protect the bikes from the cars – a bit like Copenhagen – and if you don’t do that you’re not going to get bike use up past 10%.
CBC: You’ve only been here for a while, but have you had time to look at how bike lanes are constructed here?
Rob Adams:  Well I saw one today as I was walking to the studio where it was a 2-way bikelane and had a barrier protecting it from the cars, and as a cyclist that filled my heart with joy. You need a few more of those. You know the road is just a piece of real estate. The least efficient way to use that piece of real estate is the motorcar. So good cities are going to start turning that piece of real estate over to buses, bikes, pedestrians and of course there’ll always be the car but of course not to the extent that they’re used today.”

Downtown Vancouver Bike Lanes
Divided bike lane, Vancouver. Adams was impressed.

We desperately need better design creativity inside and outside City Hall in this town. The bike lanes are a good start, but we have to halt some of the Tall Naked Capital architecture we are filling our city with. Having fought our Director of Planning this year while he gunned for a mega-casino smack in the middle of our downtown, let’s just say I’m not his biggest fan.

When Harvard Architecture’s Loeb Fellows were visiting Vancouver last week, one of them tweeted about Vancouver “can you have good urbanism without good architecture?” and I cringed. He might as well have asked “can you have good urbanism without good urban planning?” Answer to both is equally obvious: no. The architectural poverty of the condo towers thickly spreading east from Vancouver’s downtown core didn’t impress anyone. We need a Rob Adams equivalent here. And we desperately need to get on top of the property speculation as soon as possible—as Melbourne is already successfully doing. Because that destroys the livability, affordability and aesthetics of cities faster than anything else. And Vancouver City Hall is doing nothing about it. We are getting a city that becomes more unaffordable and more inhumanly designed every year.


Melbourne

More on Gordon Price’s blog here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Melbourne – now the most livable city in the world – and its cycling Director of Design, Rob Adams”

  1. Marvellous Melbourne « Price Tags Says:

    […] More here on Rob Adams visit at Ouno.

  2. Vancouver Says:

    The bike lanes in Vancouver are a very good idea, they definitely encourage people to ride their bikes, however some of the bike lanes are an accident waiting to happen because they intersect with cars turning left and right and sometimes cars blow through red lights….. as do people on bikes…. and if your trying manouver after running a red light your not necessarly looking out for people on bikes, nor are they looking out for you. The roads have also become much more congested in rush hour traffic due to the loss of lanes which have been dedicated to bikes. It also rains for 6 months of the year in Vancouver, therefore no-one rides their bikes becuase they dont want to turn up for work soaking wet – so the bike lanes are mostly empty during the bad weather and the roads are all backed up with traffic because of the loss of lanes to the bikers. Bike lanes do work but they have not been implemented very well in Vancouver – if anything they have been put in with not much thought regarding loss of parking, increased congestion etc.

  3. LB Says:

    Complaints like this surface in every city that implements bike lanes. Congestion must be dealt with by transit and cycling – peak oil was 2007 at most estimates and we simply have to decrease the burning of fossil fuels, full stop. People are accustomed to the days of cars being king, but I’m pretty sure those days are numbered. More than 50% of humans now live in cities, so this is where it has to happen. Also, if you lived in my neighbourhood you’d see that people bike rain or shine, summer and winter – they don’t have much choice, for one thing. It’s so expensive in Vancouver that many simply don’t have cars anymore. The Adanac bike route is packed with people. It just seems to me this is the wave of the future. Certainly I think divided bike lanes are the answer, as New York, Copenhagen, Melbourne and many other cities are doing. I agree there will have to be lots of fine-tuning. And more transit.

Leave a Reply