<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Petulia, 1968	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ounodesign.com/2012/05/16/petulia-1968/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ounodesign.com/2012/05/16/petulia-1968/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LB		</title>
		<link>https://ounodesign.com/2012/05/16/petulia-1968/#comment-2069</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ounodesign.com/?p=14112#comment-2069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ounodesign.com/2012/05/16/petulia-1968/#comment-2068&quot;&gt;Eric&lt;/a&gt;.

Well of course you&#039;re completely right. It&#039;s a mess as a film; I&#039;m just interested in the sets and the timing. It&#039;s one of the few examples of the reverse of the usual breakdown of the modern/traditional divide, morally speaking. As a film thought it&#039;s pretentious, aspiring to art through all that disjunction and staginess but failing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ounodesign.com/2012/05/16/petulia-1968/#comment-2068">Eric</a>.</p>
<p>Well of course you&#8217;re completely right. It&#8217;s a mess as a film; I&#8217;m just interested in the sets and the timing. It&#8217;s one of the few examples of the reverse of the usual breakdown of the modern/traditional divide, morally speaking. As a film thought it&#8217;s pretentious, aspiring to art through all that disjunction and staginess but failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://ounodesign.com/2012/05/16/petulia-1968/#comment-2068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ounodesign.com/?p=14112#comment-2068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have seen &quot;Petulia&quot; three times on DVD...and I still DON&#039;T know what the hell&#039;s it all about! I hate it (legendary film critic Pauline Kael thought so saying it was one of worst films she ever saw). Like &quot;Easy Rider&quot;, &quot;Petulia&quot; is one of those late-60&#039;s movies where I wondered, &#039;Forget about the plot...what is THE MESSAGE?!?&#039; (the sightings of Janis Joplin and The Grateful Dead, as extras, adds to the confusion) The only thing that caught my eye was Joseph Cotten: had not this film been the disappointment, he would had been nominated for a Best Supporting Actor in 1968.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen &#8220;Petulia&#8221; three times on DVD&#8230;and I still DON&#8217;T know what the hell&#8217;s it all about! I hate it (legendary film critic Pauline Kael thought so saying it was one of worst films she ever saw). Like &#8220;Easy Rider&#8221;, &#8220;Petulia&#8221; is one of those late-60&#8217;s movies where I wondered, &#8216;Forget about the plot&#8230;what is THE MESSAGE?!?&#8217; (the sightings of Janis Joplin and The Grateful Dead, as extras, adds to the confusion) The only thing that caught my eye was Joseph Cotten: had not this film been the disappointment, he would had been nominated for a Best Supporting Actor in 1968.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
