This is a live-tweet of a 4-day injunction hearing in BC Supreme Court. If you haven’t heard of Fairy Creek, it’s the last area of old-growth ancient forest on Southern Vancouver Island in British Columbia. Teal Cedar, a logging company, was given a permit to cut massive ancient trees despite the BC NDP govt having promised to save the tiny amount that remains of old-growth forest after decades of intensive logging in BC. For over a year, forest defenders have camped in the Fairy Creek area in various strategic locations, devising increasingly ingenious tactics to block logging all while staying within the bounds of peaceful civil disobedience. Fairy Creek area or “Ada’itsx” lies on unceded Pacheedaht/Dididaht Indigenous territory. One of the leaders of the forest defenders is Pacheedaht elder Bill Jones, who opposes his elected band council’s assent to cut the old-growth. To understand the position the elected council (a creature of the colonial federal govt) is in, read this.
Here’s the livetweet thread. I have embedded it here because on Twitter the thread may be broken. This is due to the fact that the Supreme Court did not instruct online watchers that screenshots could not be used, but only after the fact asked for tweets containing images be taken down. This is just formula on their part, I believe, as there was nothing sealed in what was shown; all photos and videos shown in court have already been widely circulated – including around the world – on social media as well as in journalism from Teen Vogue to the Guardian to Democracy Now. Anyway, I’ve strung the thread together here. (Someone please resurrect Storify…)
Today Teal Cedar went back to court in Nanaimo to ask for their injunction against #FairyCreek forest defenders to be extended.
The logging company’s lawyer Dean Dalke is really in a tizzy over the tactical abilities of the protesters… (thread)https://t.co/JosRejTPNK
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 14, 2021
In court, the logging company’s lawyer said of the land defenders, ‘their resistance to being arrested is just shocking!’ (This generated some amusement)
Leaving aside what “resistance” means for now, let’s just review what’s been going on with the RCMP at #FairyCreek…
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 14, 2021
Recall: the RCMP not only used this injunction to remove forest defenders from the #FairyCreek area, they exceeded their powers, & barred media from witnessing their actions, & more. In August, Judge Thompson (same judge as today) found that: https://t.co/6UkLq7L5Ea #bcpoli pic.twitter.com/Uehw0SyB3z
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Now Teal Jones is back in court facing Judge Thompson, the same judge who found against the RCMP in his courtroom in August, while its lawyer pearl clutches over protesters’ peaceful – and legal – civil disobedience.
Let’s compare this to the RCMP defying a ruling of the court.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
This demands repetition:
The RCMP exceeded its powers (illegal exclusion zones, barring media from its key watchdog role); a BC judge ruled against the RCMP; the RCMP then violated his ruling, & continues to do so.
What do we call it when police defy the courts?#FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
I think everyone knows the answer to that question. Police blatantly ignoring the courts, continuing to exceed their powers & engaging in violent extra-legal activity falls easily within the “police state” definition. The silence of the BC govt of course implicates govt as well.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
I think everyone knows the answer to that question. Police blatantly ignoring the courts, continuing to exceed their powers & engaging in violent extra-legal activity falls easily within the “police state” definition. The silence of the BC govt of course implicates govt as well.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
To return to the question of the “resistance” of protesters to arrest (which seems to describe only peaceful tactics – tree sits etc), the histrionics of Teal Jones’ lawyer Dalke seems like nothing more than a desperate attempt to justify RCMP actions on behalf of their company
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Protesters are allowed to engage in civil disobedience on “public land” like #FairyCreek. One could describe their various ingenious methods of slowing down arrests (tripods above road, tree sits, lying in trenches) as ‘resisting arrest,’ but *it is peaceful.* There is no assault
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Teal Jones’ lawyer Dalke is stopping just shy of repeating the RCMP lie that protesters are “well-funded.” Dalke: “sophisticated, organized & dangerous.” Sophisticated & organized? Yes. Well-funded? No. This is a huge underestimation of #FairyCreek forest defenders’ DIY ingenuity
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
We had friends in court today listening to the shenanigans, & they reported that a rep for the Canadian Attorney-General was present today. That’s interesting because while BC RCMP are a provincial police force, the federal AG govt still has jurisdiction.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
That’s it for now. Tomorrow is another day in court in Nanaimo & it should be more interesting. Apparently there’s a livestream and I will try to livetweet it if I can get on it. Will append that to this thread. If anything here is incorrect or if you have Qs please jump in.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
It’s Day 2 of the court hearing in Nanaimo. The logging company Teal Jones is seeking to win an extension for its injunction against #FairyCreek forest defenders. Today we’re hearing from Elders for Ancient Trees & Rainforest Flying Squad who are opposing the extension #oldgrowth
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
And just a clarification from yesterday tho I’ve tweeted about this before, RCMP are the national police force but in BC (unlike Ontario and Quebec but like many other provinces) are contracted as provincial police, & come under the jurisdiction of the BC govt/Solicitor-General
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Note: correct spelling of lawyer’s name is Steve Kelliher
Right now, the courtroom is hearing from Steve Kelleher, lawyer for the two groups: Elders for Ancient Trees & Rainforest Flying Squad.
Kelleher is currently reading testimony from eminent BC forester @AnthonyBritneff #FairyCreek #fairyCreekBlockade #bcpoli @KatrineConroy
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
From @AnthonyBritneff‘s affidavit: “The BC Forest Service has become an extension of the forest industry…
The forest industry through Council of Forest Industry *approves senior management positions in the BC Ministry of Forests*’
!!! #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
From @AnthonyBritneff‘s affidavit: “I spoke to someone in a junior [Ministry of Forests] management position who told me that his appointment was awaiting final approval from COFI” (Council of Forest Industries)
Now Kelleher outlines all the subsidies BC gives to forest industry
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
This is going too fast to capture everything but I’ll screenshot some of Kelliher’s presentation to the court – this will only be a few highlights (needed more coffee)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
“Teal Cedar as part of the forest industry is in a real sense the Ministry of Forests. It operates in place of its captive. When govt is so closely entwined with corporate activity” .. in a matter of public interest..We are protected by Section 7 of the Charter incl right to life
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
In short Kelleher is arguing that the Ministry of Forests is operating outside of the bounds of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.#FairyCreek #fairyCreekBlockade #bcpoli
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
To sum up, this injunction hearing is giving Steve Kelleher, lawyer for Elders for Ancient Trees and the Rainforest Flying Squad, the opportunity to lay the corporate capture of the Ministry of Forests in detail, & demonstrate that MoF can thus not protect the public interest.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
The issue is climate change – “the harm caused by the destruction of old growth forests is so great that it is immeasurable and affects us all gravely… and will eventually threaten life itself”
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Re: what the Pacheedaht stands to gain from #oldgrowth logging in #FairyCreek in their territory – Kelleher is saying that their share of the logging profits from #FairyCreek is only enough to buy one of Teal Cedar’s logging trucks.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
‘Teal Cedar as has accumulated a vast fortune logging the #oldgrowth forests of British Columbia while Indigenous groups have made very little, yet they stand here in this courtroom using Indigenous rights to justify their activities.’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
“Teal Cedar comes to the court saying the RCMP decide not to enforce the law? The RCMP won’t enforce the law unless you give us the injunction? That has a coercive ring to it, a threatening tone. Teal Cedar saying police won’t do their job unless you give us what we want?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
M’lord, the climate crisis is not going away; the public interest is not going away. The opposition is only going to grow. How much leeway are you going to give the RCMP, should this injunction be awarded?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
(These summaries aren’t direct quotes – it’s going too quickly to keep up, so pardon the clumsy summaries)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
This is Patrick Canning, lawyer for some of the protesters:
Now we have lawyer Canning:
“Are Teal Cedar and RCMP above the law? They are acting as such.” #FairyCreek #bcpoli
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Canning (who is either the lawyer for Rainforest Flying Squad or Elders for Ancient Trees, I’m trying to get confirmation)
He’s effectively saying that Teal Cedar has used the injunction as cover to work with the RCMP illegally
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
It’s hard to follow this – Canning is going too fast and it’s in the legal weeds. He’s talking about RCMP raids on people’s cars (confiscation/destruction) that weren’t illegally parked at the #FairyCreek HQ camp – he’s laying out extralegal behaviour by RCMP
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Much of Canning’s presentation concerns arbitrary power assumed and exerted by the RCMP – he began with a quote from Thomas Paine about arbitrary power – ‘it doesn’t enter a country all at once, but step by step’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
The court has paused for lunch. Here’s the opening section of the final legal presentation by the lawyers for Rainforest Flying Squad and Elders for Ancient Trees on the #FairyCreek injunction. pic.twitter.com/IA3YcXu6RH
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Perhaps the most explosive section of the presentation by the lawyer for the #FairyCreek forest defenders vs. Teal Cedar is the affidavit by @AnthonyBritneff who worked for the BC Forest Service for 40 years. He describes the full corporate capture of the Min. of Forests: #bcpoli pic.twitter.com/0A7HQr1KXS
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Will have to pick this up later. Lawyers are coming back from lunch but we have a #SiteC/#Keeyask dam resisters’ zoom call now (one issue after another). Will go through the legal arguments and resume later this aft.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
We now have Patrick Canning presenting to the court in Nanaimo on the #FairyCreek injunction application. He’s the lawyer for Rainforest Flying Squad I believe?
NOTE: spelling correction, Steven *Kelliher* is the lawyer rep’ing who presented first, for Elders for Ancient Trees
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Here’s the information on Elders for Ancient Trees and their opposition to Teal Cedar’s application for an injunction extension on #FairyCreek. Lawyer is Steven Kelliher https://t.co/n2rbJPJeBT
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Patrick Canning, lawyer for Rainforest Flying Squad, going all the way back to the Magna Carta to argue that *everyone* is subject to the law.
“Without the rule of law, there is only the rule of might.”
Obvious reference to RCMP operating outside law at #FairyCreek. #bcpoli
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Canning is referencing previous cases in which injunctions were denied.
He’s arguing that the system is bypassing procedural rights and is geared to convicting those practicing civil disobedience for the sake of efficiency
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Judge Thompson asks what has changed since the first injunction was granted, after Teal Cedar applied to court to get access to timber they have a right to
Canning: it undermines the rule of law: this is not a normal injunction extension case, this is an experiment by the RCMP
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
That “experiment” by RCMP includes media exclusion zones, confiscation of personal property, etc – Canning is talking about RCMP testing the limits of what they can get away with
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
This is hard to follow but I think the lawyers for Rainforest Flying Squad are arguing that instead of the injunction extension, the court could send this issue to mediation with govt, Pacheedaht & I assume Teal Cedar
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
First reference I’ve heard of the RCMP officers wearing thin blue line patches. Mention also of over 350 complaints to the RCMP. Mention of @bccla questioning the efficacy of the complaint process – can anyone else who’s listening in please confirm?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
2nd lawyer (name?) arguing that this isn’t just an application for an injunction extension – it is in effect a veiled workaround, an application for variation on police powers, asking judge to revisit core issues dealt with on their previous application
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Judge Thompson says that he had said in his earlier decision, which dealt specifically with media’s (not forest defenders’) access to #FairyCreek vs RCMP, that the RCMP should apply separately for an extension of their powers, but that the federal A-G had taken issue w this
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
For Judge Thompson’s August ruling in favour of the media’s right to access #FairyCreek and witness RCMP actions (a ruling the RCMP have ignored and violated since), @davidpball wrote a good summary for @cbcnewsbc https://t.co/6UkLq7L5Ea
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
When Judge Thompson pointed out that the hearing in August solely dealt with media, the 2nd lawyer for Rainforest Flying Squad argued that you can’t really separate the media issue from a homogeneous whole. RCMP illegally excluding media is part of the larger rights issue.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
2nd lawyer for RFS ends his submission by saying that these injunctions do not take into account the extreme circumstances of climate change and ecosystem collapse that affect us all. “What this calls for is a bold response from the court for a more just and equitable society.”
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
We are now watching video of Pacheedaht elder Bill Jones at #FairyCreek, complaining directly to RCMP officers on the ground that they are breaking the law and preventing him from access to/protecting his sacred areas #oldgrowth #Indigenousrights @MurrayRankinNDP @mikefarnworthbc
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
The court was then shown a terrifying video of a Teal Jones logger assaulting a peaceful protestor
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Now hearing from lawyer Matthew Nefstead on the evidentiary basis for their arguments (rather than legal basis).
Responding to A-G of Canada’s response to their application. AG said the order they requested “is so vague as to be meaningless” re the media exclusion zones, but…
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Nefstead says in response to this that their application is not vague (ie unclear about which media exclusion zones); they are arguing that *all* exclusion zones are illegal.
And RCMP would have to demonstrate that exclusion zones are necessary for them to do their work
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Lawyer Matthew Nefstead is listing a number of instances when RCMP violated Judge Thompson’s ruling that RCMP could not enforce illegal “exclusion zones” keeping out media and Elders for Ancient Trees
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
In one instance media were forced by RCMP to walk 7 km up to the area where arrests were occurring at #FairyCreek [impossible with TV and other equipment]
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
In one instance media were forced by RCMP to walk 7 km up to the area where arrests were occurring at #FairyCreek [impossible with TV and other equipment]
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
When members of the public have challenged RCMP on the ground that their actions are unlawful and violate either Judge Thompson’s ruling or the original injunction, they say they are following orders from their superiors. #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
The RCMP has tried to argue that under 1 km is legitimate distance to keep media from their actions as a safety perimeter. Nefstead saying that a safety perimeter might reasonably be a small ring, but not 1 km [distancet a which media obvs cannot properly monitor police actions]
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
When Elders for Ancient Trees have tried to access sites to engage in lawful peaceful protest and to observe how the RCMP were or were not changing their approach to media exclusion zones, following Judge Thompson’s ruling. They encountered a gate manned by RCMP.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Referring to P6 of an affidavit by Jackie Larkin of Elders for Ancient Trees describing RCMP excluding elders from a site up Granite Main. It appears that the access control point was established just as they approached to stop them from proceeding further. No shade on a hot day
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Elders tried to argue this was unlawful; RCMP said they were just following orders. One of the elders fainted in the heat, was attended by a doctor in the group, & taken back down the road by RCMP vehicle. In the activity a protest sign was placed on a vehicle; RCMP took it
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Affidavit noted that this exclusion zone was deliberately placed in a clearcut zone on a hot day in a heatwave, and not in a shaded area 100m just up the road.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Affidavit noted that this exclusion zone was deliberately placed in a clearcut zone on a hot day in a heatwave, and not in a shaded area 100m just up the road.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
The lawyer Matthew Nefstead is painting a picture of the arbitrary actions of RCMP in enforcing exclusions zones. Personal editorial – it presents a picture of petty and cruel actions against elders exerting their legal rights on a public road.
End of hearing for today.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Appending this here: https://t.co/qj9qrS6t8O
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 15, 2021
Day 3
Here I have been forced to remove some tweets as they included visuals that weren’t supposed to be tweeted from court (though as I said earlier, we were never advised of this until after the fact). Textual content of tweets that were deleted follows, minus the images.
It’s day 3 of the #FairyCreek injunction hearing in BC Supreme Court in Nanaimo. Various groups & individuals are opposing Teal Cedar’s application to extend its injunction against forest defenders.
They’re currently cueing up video of RCMP overstep…#bcpoli #oldgrowth
Correction from yesterday – it was a scramble to catch up, and thanks to lawyer Phil Dwyer for providing the details. Lawyer Steven Kelliher is representing Saul (Robert) Arbess, whom many of us know from BC forestry discussions. https://t.co/pQgbp0ZQBj
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer (apologies, seeking her name) is giving background on TFL 46 (tree farm), its location and the site of the defender camps. She is representing 2 of the forest defenders, a younger man and woman. #FairyCreek #fairycreekblockade
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
“The plaintiff is implying that they are harvesting trees from a “tree farm” {TF46) but this is not a tree farm, it’s an ancient forest. The words that we use define what we are doing. We need to be very careful how we describe what we are actually talking about in these courts”
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer: we have already spent so many months trying to deal with this injunction but it has been an utter failure & every lawyer in this courtroom knows that, including the RCMP lawyer and Teal Jones’ lawyer. “Enforcement is futile unless we are given further militaristic powers”
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
‘Protesters aren’t there because they want to confront the police, or because they want to engage in criminal behaviour. They are listening to the UN, they are listening to the science, and they are looking at a future that is very bleak.’ #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
#FairyCreek is the last intact watershed in Southern Vancouver Island. That’s why protesters are there.
Now lawyer is detailing the *current* manifestations of climate change in BC: flooding, heat dome, #WhiteRockLakeFire, rain falling on Greenland for the first time in history
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
#FairyCreek is the last intact watershed in Southern Vancouver Island. That’s why protesters are there.
Now lawyer is detailing the *current* manifestations of climate change in BC: flooding, heat dome, #WhiteRockLakeFire, rain falling on Greenland for the first time in history
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Deleted tweet:
‘Teal Jones had a great responsibility when they came to ask for an injunction extension, and they have not lived up to it. And the RCMP have not lived up to it. We are going to show video & photos of the RCMP overstep at #FairyCreek’
We are shown a photo that clearly shows a disallowed thin blue line patch on the chest of an RCMP officer, dressed in a dark blue ballistic vest
‘See this officer? He is not only wearing the thin blue line, widely considered to be racist and disallowed by the RCMP, but he is also not wearing a name badge, his face covered by a covid mask and gloves. If you complain to him, he says talk to the police commissioner.’
‘Here’s another image of an RCMP officer wearing the thin blue line, in the face of an Indigenous woman drumming, a woman who has just also had to witness the discovery of the bodies of their children in unmarked graves at residential “schools”
Indigenous people find this badge racist.’
(The thin blue line patch is worn on their upper right chest, right where their name badge should be) @BCRCMP
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
‘Teal Cedar has implied the road the protesters are on is their road. It’s not their road, it’s a public road. Arguably it’s a road on Indigenous territory. This Indig woman & her children were camping there. RCMP formed a sudden “exclusion zone” moved her sans her belongings
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
They’re showing a video with police pushing people off a road via a temporarily exclusion zone, which is to assist industry, but there’s no industry there, which a protester points out. Officer reads out Judge Verhoeven’s injunction. Protester asks for badge #, is arrested
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
RCMP officer had given the man 5 minutes to get off the road; was arrested before the 5 minutes were up
Now a photo of a Teal Cedar vehicle arbitrarily removing the belongings of protesters. This isn’t trash, this is their belongings taken away – by industry, not police.
Affidavit #2 Warren Kimmitt, Exhibit A, photo of truck removing possessions
Now lawyer shows the video of the police officer smashing his foot through a guitar he has just grabbed at #FairyCreek
This is an area where people have camped for decades, this is where the Pacheedaht have done their ceremonies here for 1000s of years. This is not a “tree farm”
Affidavit #3 of Geoffrey Pearson Exhibit D
_____
‘Those being violently arrested are just regular people holding onto each other. They’re just like those people who sad down at universities and were pepper sprayed. ‘
Now shows video of cops – including “green men” (ERT?) pulling down woman’s mask. Then another woman’s…
Judge Thompson is asking the video clips to be played several times, so he can see what’s going on. I can feel my heart pounding – it’s horrifying to watch, and enraging.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
To-be-deleted tweet:
Now we’re watching video of pepper spraying. Media being shoved aside. People being dragged to the ground in front of moving vehicles. ‘These are just regular people m’lord. They are not terrorists, no violence, they’re not armed’
(Horrifying photos – these are all availabe on the Fairy Creek Blockade’s social media accounts)
‘See how they’re being pepper sprayed directly, that poor boy w his head pulled up… Now see the RCMP pulling protesters from outside of the observation zone into the observation zone (upgrade from an exclusion zone) – see Officer Burr’s affidavit Tab 44 para 22
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
This is stressful – it’s a long video, 12 minutes. Hard to get good screenshots as it’s stuttering a bit and moving fast. We see people screaming as they’re pepper sprayed in the face at close range – and one woman going into convulsions
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Later that day, RCMP released this press release, giving their version of the story. What you see in their description is not what you see in the video #FairyCreek
“Update #80 on police enforcement of injunction order in Fairy Creek watershed”
2021/08/21
RCMP: “Police enforcement of the BC Supreme Court injunction order in the Fairy Creek Watershed area continued today, on August 21, 2021, in the same area where officers have been primarily focussing their efforts for the past several days.
Early in the day, police were met by individuals who were blocking the roadway and in locking devices attached to an industry gate. There was pushing and shoving and OC spray was deployed when the crowd failed to comply with police directions and became aggressive. One police officer was injured with a concussion and transported to hospital. One protester was also assessed by EHS and transported form the area. Approximately 30 individuals were arrested for contempt of court, including one minor.”
‘After that video was released later that day on social media, along with other videos, there were protests across BC and actually the country over #policebrutality’
then the RCMP released *another* video saying they’ve pushed over an officer. Let’s look at video again: (video shows officer tripping all on his own as he steps back into a ditch)
More RCMP press release (I can include this as it’s public)
For Immediate Release August 21, 2021
Province-Wide RCMP Stand Down Actions
Monday August 23
1-3 pm Pacific
Where: RCMP detachments and offices across Briish Columbia (and Toronto, as of August 21).
These actions take place on unceded indigenous lands. See locations at bottom of media release.
Grassroots organizers across BC are calling for a province-wide protest against the illegal and violent actions of the RCmP in the ancient forests of Ad’itsx/Fairy Creek.
We gatther to demand that the RCMP stand down immediately.
Wea re witnessing the actions of a police state. During a time of intense national and global connected crises (climate crisis, extinction crisis, overdose crisis, pandemi, housing crisis, and a crisis of almost zero honourable reconcilsation wint Indigenous people as the ‘discovery’ of deaths of residental school children rises into the 6000+ range) the RCP is enabled by our governments to facilitate business s usual for th eprimary benfit of already rich peoplle.
THIS IS A FEDERAL ELECTION ISSUE.
Background:
Since enforcement began at Ad’itsx/Fairy Creek in May, the RCMP have arrested ~700 UNARMED PEACEFUL VOLUNTEERS doing the job Premier John Horgan made an election promise to do: protect the VERY VERY VERY last of the old growth forests in the province (less than 3% of the ecologically important ancient forests). The court injunction the RCMP are enforcing specifically emphasizes the constitutional right of protest in Canada. A second judgment in the BC Supreme Court in July upheld this right and admonished the RCMP for acting illegally.
‘IN the video we see he & the rest of officers are trying to push the protesters, who are linked arm in arm, and that officer steps back and falls into a ditch. No one pushed him – you can see it.
This is concerted disinformation about these people in media & in submissions.’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Deleted tweet:
Next video. ‘This video shows helicopter doing ‘dusting’ on the road, blowing up dust around gathered protesters
‘These are just people, including families, walking along a forest road with indigenous people drumming.
An example of police trying to stop peaceful protest’ #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Deleted tweet:
Now we’re looking at photos of people being extracted from trenches and other devices. Lawyer says she’s going to go through these photos slowly. #FairyCreek
Photo: huge earthmover machine, one small protester lying in ditch in dirt road
‘If the excavator operator hits a chain or that arm, he would sever that arm. He doesn’t know what’s down there, and neither do we. If that bucket moved back and forth at all, he could hit that head and a hardhat’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Judge is asking how to remove them then. She says “use a shovel, that’s how they got there.
I see what you’re saying, m’lord, but you can’t do this under WorksafeBC. If she died? We’d be having a Royal Commission right now.’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Deleted tweet:
Photos of excavators digging protesters out. ‘There is no ambulance anywhere nearby, in case the protesters are harmed’
‘If the excavator operator makes a mistake, she’ll be crushed. You don’t use big machinery to dig out an arm’
Photos of massive Caterpillar excavator over prone protester
Deleted tweet, with photos from above of massive machine hovering over prone woman, from the affidavit of Warren Kimmitt:
This woman has a massive excavator digging at her. ‘She doesn’t even have a hardhat on. This is designed to terrorize her. Yes, she has buried her arm to buy a few hours. She’s terrified about her future. She’s not going to university or having children; she’s here protecting her future’
Lawyer reads out the comments of an excavator operator who makes it clear this can’t be done safely and is absolutely being used mainly to intimidate
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Deleted tweets:
Now we’re looking at photos of excavator extracting a protester from a “tripod” across the road. ‘He’s only got one line across that very sharp area of the bucket. Operator says he’s had training in line work and all lines should be doubled’… (lots of complicated info here)
‘This is an older woman, shown terrified in a prior photo, not supported by a proper harness, falling as police bring her down. An elderly woman.’
‘Mr Kimmit says this would be dangerous for even a younger woman. See her slipping through the single strap, in a dangerous posture’
Video of the police cutting the bottom of a tripod causing young men to fall from 15 feet.
Judge: ‘the protesters are using ingenious methods to make extraction difficult, time-consuming, dangerous, in aid of their cause. They’re counting on police to exercise utmost care’
The judge is saying that police would be much rougher elsewhere, and he is having a hard time with the submission for this reason
Lawyer: there is no reason for these people not to be protected with gear, and we should be better than those “other places.” These aren’t terrorists
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Deleted tweet:
Lawyer: ‘This needs to be dialed down or someone will be seriously hurt or lose their life.
This photo shows a Teal Jones excavator. Not a police excavator operator. That’s significant. (Teal Cedar, the company cutting #FairyCreek and area)
Deleted tweet:
Photos: ‘Here’s a boy being lowered down with a noose tightening around his waist/ribs and his entire body weight on that rope. He’s being lowered from a cherry picker.
‘I would suggest THAT is like another country, M’lord, yet it’s happening in Canada’ #FairyCreek
I’ve temporarily lost the stream. Lawyer is talking about the fact that these videos are circulating. Citizens, including older people, are watching these things and seeing that this is police practice. #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Deleted tweet:
We are shown video of RCMP officer threatening with a media person: “If you speak, you’re gone”
Also video of live broadcast from CBC, reporter saying that in order to get into #FairyCreek they had to walk 7 km uphill to cover the issue, same at end of day so will have walked 14 km to cover this
Deleted tweet, photos of young woman up a tripod over the road:
'M'lord we have a great problem in #FairyCreek.
Eve Green is 17 yo. Yes, she put herself at risk, on a tripod, because she's frightened for her future. She also has an anxiety disorder, which the RCMP knew. She asked a female police officer to remove her leg chains; said no… pic.twitter.com/cjhUG9V32g
— Lindsay Brown – Wear A Mask (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer: ‘M’lord we have a great problem in #FairyCreek.
Eve Green is 17 yo. Yes, she put herself at risk, on a tripod, because she’s frightened for her future. She also has an anxiety disorder, which the RCMP knew. She asked a female police officer to remove her leg chains, who said no…
Eve Green then asked for her medication which was being held by the police liaison; they said no, when you get in the car. She started to have a full-on anxiety attack, asked for meds, they said “when you sign” and drove her to Cowichan – she didn’t even know what she was signing
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer describing all of the people up at #FairyCreek – ‘families, lawyers, older women, Indigenous elders… “These are not terrorists.” Their treatment is bringing the justice system into disrepute.
‘These people are looking for the court to help.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
‘Faith in justice rides on this case.
M’lord you might say, well what can I do?
Make this a proper civil case. Send it to mediation. Otherwise the militarism is going to escalate #FairyCreek #bcpoli
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer ends by saying that one man did die later of the effects of these events, and then his wife miscarried. “We are losing people.” End of submission.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer Steven Kelliher noting now that Ministry of Forests has not responded to their written arguments which it has had since Sept 7 and has had @AnthonyBritneff‘s affidavit since August. Does it have standing to speak now at all? Now they wish to stand?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Kelliher is asking for their submission to be given no weight. And Teal Cedar has had our full written submission since Sept 7.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer Matthew Nefstead wants to note re: the pepper spraying that there is another video by Christie Greer, professional 4K video that he wants added to evidence
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Now we have Katherine Reilly speaking for the Ministry of Forests.
Talking about the affidavits of @DrSuzanneSimard
& @AnthonyBritneff
as irrelevant, argumentative and vexatious #FairyCreek— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Katherine Reilly speaking for Ministry of Forests says that the evidence of @AnthonyBritneff, who had 40 years in the BC Forest Service & is an eminent forester, that Britneff’s statements about industry capture of the ministry are ill-founded. Now she attempts to discredit him.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Katherine Reilly speaking for Ministry of Forests says that the evidence of @AnthonyBritneff, who had 40 years in the BC Forest Service & is an eminent forester, that Britneff’s statements about industry capture of the ministry are ill-founded. Now she attempts to discredit him.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Now Reilly moves to Dr. Suzanne Simard, reminding court affidavit is not an expert report and she seems to be trying to undermine the credibility of Dr. Simard (let’s remember that Simard is an internationally renowned forest ecologist)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Sorry, there’s some procedural stuff going on with affidavits that I’m not following
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
There was just something of a skirmish when lawyers on the Min of Forests/Teal Cedar side wanted to introduce new info & forest defenders’ lawyers said police actions are unfolding daily & yet they haven’t been permitted to add new affidavits detailing these… #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Break for lunch, and not a moment too soon.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
And in the meantime, you may want to follow @SaveFairyCreek https://t.co/WMaakCa0hp #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
And while court is still on lunch, more international media on #FairyCreek making BC an international embarrassment https://t.co/xvjFk0qXOd
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Court is now resuming in the #FairyCreek injunction extension application hearing in BC Supreme Court in Nanaimo. Watch on the livestream. #bcpoli https://t.co/jGUjcsI2nP
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Apparently people are abusing the MS Teams chat or using it in ways seen as out of bounds; there’s a discussion about whether this is the same as people acting out of bounds in a physical courtroom. Interesting Q. There is no way to shut down the chat it seems (I haven’t seen it)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Judge is seeking advice from all the lawyers, and they all agree that no one should be chatting in the middle of court. Lawyers for the #FairyCreek side are asking that the the chat function is not the forum for this purpose; Matthew Nefstead asks supporters to stop.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer for Attorney-General of Canada, rep’ing the RCMP, making several points: while the AGC acknowledges the reality of climate change, it is the job of the RCMP to carry out the court’s order/injunction. But further, this is not the venue to try the RCMP on its conduct…
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Again apologies, didn’t catch the name of this lawyer, who’s physically in the courtroom not coming in from remote so I can’t see her name.
The judge asks her how he is supposed to wait for the bogged-down RCMP complaints process?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer Nygaard for the Attorney-General of Canada /RCMP:
She says that the judge should not be prejudging those police complaints based on what’s a very limited record of incidents before him.
She allows that there have been “mistakes of judgment” on the part of individual officers
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Canadian AG lawyer for RCMP saying that just the fact that there are all these complaints against the RCMP does not indict them, “it’s a neutral fact”
Judge Thompson: ‘but is this timely? Is it going to be next month, year, or 2030?’ (!)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Canadian AG lawyer for RCMP saying that months or longer is a reasonable time frame. If the complaints lead to trial that too would take weeks or months. These aren’t the sorts of decisions that should be made on the fly
Judge: sure it takes time, but…
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
This is a jurisdictional and procedural discussion I guess about whether the evidence against police is admissible as it hasn’t been established as illegal.
Judge Thompson: let’s flip the coin. Re the behaviour of the protesters: must we await another body to analyze that?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Judge Thompson: I have to wait for a complaints process? I must act based on what I am seeing. I’m seeing protesters dug into trenches & on tripods. Likewise I am seeing police pulling down masks & directly spraying pepper spray on faces, & wearing the thin blue lines. Why wait?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Canadian A-G lawyer for RCMP: we received 67 affidavits in total on Sept 7. She’s criticizing some of them for being incomplete?
Says these RCMP officers are drawn from throughout the RCMP then go home to their home area, & it’s hard for us to track them all down
Excuses?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Canadian A-G lawyer for RCMP saying based on these issues it’s not possible for the judge to make a decision on whether the actions of the RCMP were or were not appropriate.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Canadian A-G lawyer for RCMP saying based on these issues it’s not possible for the judge to make a decision on whether the actions of the RCMP were or were not appropriate.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
There’s a long discussion about police actions at #FairyCreek. Lawyer for A-G disputes whether the photos are accurate (angles etc)
But then we hear that RCMP need pepper spray and you have to remove masks or it won’t work
This is a rep for the Attorney-General of Canada.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer for the A-G of Canada is taking issue with lawyers [& by extension me/others] who say the protesters are both peaceful and legal. Peaceful maybe, she says, but legal? They’re blocking the road against an injunction. This is where it gets fuzzy around civil disobedience
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer for the A-G of Canada is taking issue with lawyers [& by extension me/others] who say the protesters are both peaceful and legal. Peaceful maybe, she says, but legal? They’re blocking the road against an injunction. This is where it gets fuzzy around civil disobedience
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Judge Thompson: we can either decide that a police officer stomping his foot through a guitar is what it is; should we wait for a police complaints process on that?
Lawyer for the A-G: I’m not even going to attempt to defend that. But those few actions shouldn’t taint everything
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
15 minute break. Someone keeps saying the word “blob” on the livestream now, which is a tad odd.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer for the A-G /RCMP is going over the details of affidavits describing inappropriate police behaviour. I’m not going to go into all the details because it is impossible to keep up. Will try to summarize/give key examples of her defense of police behaviour
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer for the A-G of Canada /RCMP: she’s responding one by one to the descriptions of police behaviour detailed earlier in this thread. Re the female police officer who didn’t help the young woman, lawyer says no female RCMP officers are trained in aerial extraction
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
[Seems a little weak – that female officer could have asked for the assistance of her colleagues nearby on site who were clearly trained to do the extraction because they were busy doing it]
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Trying not to editorialize too much but it’s hard to stomach much of what the lawyer for the AG of Canada/RCMP is saying:
‘Officers HAVE TO pull people’s covid masks down to spray pepper spray in people’s faces “OR IT WON’T WORK.” Now she’s commending the RCMP’s professionalism.— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
The classic abuser’s excuse:
She just said they are having to do these things because of the resistance they are facing. So the protesters are making the police do this.
Judge Thompson: if someone doesn’t actively walk away with the police is that “resisting arrest”? Where is the line?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Then a whole discussion about what constitutes “resisting arrest”
Lawyer for the A-G of Canada /RCMP: when protesters don’t go willingly, that’s resisting arrest and it’s appropriate for RCMP to use “force”
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer for the A-G of Canada /RCMP: with some of these “sleeping dragon” contraptions the protesters can walk away or even swap out for each other. Says RCMP try to get them to leave voluntarily and sometimes they do, sometimes they don’t.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Yes and it’s a good point: https://t.co/0KCVNOKvuk
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Lawyer Nygard for A-G of Canada/RCMP: they’re hashing out civil disobedience issue and what police powers are (they can’t arrest for contempt)
Judge saying that there are very different cases with many of these arrests, but this has been going on a long time, & it’s not working
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Thanks for assistance here Steve! https://t.co/czWcVUK02c
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
It’s 4 pm. Court resumes tomorrow morning at 9:45. Judge Thompson says it will surprise no one that he intends to reserve in this case as there is no way he can have a decision by Sept 26 when the injunction expires, & he expects lawyers to respond tomorrow. See you tmrw all.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 16, 2021
Here’s one summary of today’s #FairyCreek injunction hearing in BC Supreme Court, by Kathy Code (Facebook link) https://t.co/6Y2IN6mCMV
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
It’s Day 4 of the of the #FairyCreek injunction hearing in BC Supreme Court in Nanaimo. Various groups & individuals are opposing Teal Cedar’s application to extend its injunction against forest defenders. #bcpoli
Watch here:https://t.co/XlmTA7ghXJ— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Final deleted tweet – picture of the livestream, but I guess you can’t show that.
old tweet URL
https://twitter.com/Lidsville/status/1438908579868643337
This is what it looks like in BC Supreme Court today – Nanaimo courtroom on the left, Judge Thompson at centre, lawyers calling in from remote on the right (a bottom right that’s Steven Kelliher, lawyer for Saul (Robert) Arbess, one of the complainants. #FairyCreek
Before I continue, recall: y’day at the very end of the court session Judge Thompson stated he intends to reserve in this case, as there is no way he can have a decision by Sept 26 when the injunction expires, and that…https://t.co/2Ye1HuaweK
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
..and that today Judge Thompson will ask all of the lawyers what they individually think should be provisionally put in place after the term of the injunction expires & before the date on which he is able to make a ruling on the evidence before him. “Because this is not working”
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Back to today’s proceedings: lawyer for the A-G of Canada & now responding to earlier arguments by lawyer for #FairyCreek defenders Patrick Canning on an individual often apparently contracted out to both Teal Cedar and the RCMP who was aggressive with protesters
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Re: police not wearing name tags. Lawyer for A-G of Canada/RCMP saying due to online targeting of RCMP officers, RCMP let them take name tags off.
Judge: so why didn’t they use badge numbers?
Lawyer: they didn’t have those.
Judge: They had time to make thin blue line patches (!)— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer for A-G of Canada/RCMP:
A bit hard to hear which complaint we’re dealing with now over the rustling of documents. But the lawyer is responding one by one to accusations against RCMP officers raised over the past few days.— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer for A-G of Canada/RCMP: “this is a very long police action, it’s very complex, of course police have made mistakes, no one should expect perfection.”
Editorializing: so we should be kind and fair, and forgive #PoliceBrutality even if has traumatized kids, because reasons.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I had quoted my own tweet here, but as I’ve had to delete that tweet you won’t see it here. It’s not needed anyway. It just shows the Teen Vogue journalist, along with a CBC journalist.
Lawyer for A-G of Canada/RCMP: on yesterday’s video of police threatening the media person, whom she thinks was from @TeenVogue:
She says officer’s RCMP superior agrees this was out of line but that it doesn’t require disciplinary actionhttps://t.co/dr5G82jWCm— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
This is an excellent summary of what’s going on here with the lawyer for A-G of Canada/RCMP – and bringing up this key point that Judge Thompson has already said re: the police enforcement at #FairyCreek: “this is not working.” https://t.co/QKG3adpyvW
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
The lawyer for A-G of Canada/RCMP saying RCMP weren’t “confiscating” personal belongings of protesters, just ‘moving them’ (!) etc etc
Judge Thompson: are we going to get back to the thin blue line patch? #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer: there is more context on that thin blue line patch
Judge Thompson wants to know if when RCMP are enforcing a court order, they are under the direction of the court & how does that patch figure under these conditions & reflect back on the court?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer talking about layers of jurisdiction and the union but as Steve says: Judge saying “I don’t see why I should give a hoot about that; my concern is the reputation of the court” https://t.co/UzP9yduRJf
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer: the RCMP isn’t working for the court
Judge: But every RCMP press release begins with “we are enforcing an injunction of the court & doing court’s bidding.” He’s getting impatient with the discussions about independence
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer: I don’t doubt some individuals interpret that patch the way they say they do
Judge: Sure. But we have to judge the meaning of that patch based on what has gone on around us for the last couple of years (referencing of course #BLM /racism)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I’m going to include some of the tweets that I’m seeing in my mentions as we go along. Can’t disagree with this. https://t.co/aY2MP8IkMi
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer for A-G/RCMP now talking about the increasingly difficulty of removing protesters in increasingly complex contraptions – sleeping dragons, tripods, trenches in the road, under logs, tree sits, cantilevers
Judge: Isn’t this old? Isn’t it what triggered the orig injunction?— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Or to say this more simply, Steve coming in with a more laser-like assessment of what’s going on right now (thanks Steve) https://t.co/toHyiDPf62
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I just got kicked off the feed – attempting to get back in. Has anyone else experienced this?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I just got kicked off the feed – attempting to get back in. Has anyone else experienced this?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Good time to have lost the feed – court is now on break. It’s so much easier when there’s more than one of us on this, thanks @SteveLloyd001 https://t.co/AHm3l5ZTzi
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
The feed has returned from the BC Supreme Court Nanaimo courtroom.
As for what the judge will decide, as a rule I maintain ‘hope without guarantees’ rather than optimism/pessimism, always. https://t.co/8ghQJqktWF
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
And I suspect this is why I got kicked off. It’s very odd that not once has the court instructed the audience that any of this is disallowed – an oversight on their part. Because all of the evidence has already been seen widely on social media, and the names of those giving affidavits is not secret, I guess this is purely a procedural rule and has nothing to do with anything being made public that should be sealed or anything.
OK so we’ve just been informed (this is news to me) that we aren’t allowed to take screenshots of the court proceedings. Makes sense. So we won’t be seeing any more of those, apologies.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Well, well.https://t.co/53eTJsJ9YC
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I guess we’ll see… It remains shocking that RCMP officers arresting protesters have been wearing no ID badges. https://t.co/eTW4zOtcit
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer for A-G/RCMP: now looking at maps of the #FairyCreek area and laying out where police stops were. Thanks @SteveLloyd001 for this analysis: https://t.co/JiXxf8kEZ0
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer for A-G/RCMP: mentions “protester incursion” into areas
Judge Thompson: “police incursion?”
RCMP Lawyer: it’s grating to the public ear but it’s just police term
Judge: It’s policespeak
Lawyer: yes
Judge: would you also talk about lawyer incursion, media incursion? (!)— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Precisely. https://t.co/jCTWtMJVhO
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer for A-G of Canada/RCMP:
Now talking about the need for RCMP to do voluntary searches on the road. Note if you don’t submit, you are turned away. She is saying this increases flow of protesters entering the area (!)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Wow, this is getting into iffy territory. RCMP lawyer saying these “conditional entry searches” increase access to #FairyCreek because it allows RCMP to keep out “people who might cause a problem”
When people tell you who they are…
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer talking about people “coming through temporary exclusion zones in large numbers. If this happened at the buffer zone, that would be al massive problem”
Remember that where people have overwhelmed police exclusion zones, they are groups of white-haired elders/seniors.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Judge Thompson is referencing other protests incl one in Edmonton. We’ve got an exclusion zone, a little one and a big one: where is the line? Lawyer: this isn’t an urban protest, it’s a remote rural area where extraction is going on, more volatile, dangerous & unpredictable
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer: here we have a history of protestors breaking thru lines set up by police. If they’d previously broken through a small cordoned area, police would be justified in setting a larger cordoned off area. …there’s 1 road in and out & RCMP can get trapped between protesters
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Exactly – RCMP lawyer is trying to paint the RCMP as the party in danger here. They’re coming in with officers effectively paramilitary-trained, fully armed with weapons including chemical, to deal with peaceful protesters. https://t.co/fsILrIV0aS
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Judge Thompson isn’t really buying the argument that the RCMP are in danger at #FairyCreek, which is the tack the lawyer for the A-G of Canada & the RCMP is repeatedly taking. https://t.co/Brd04cjlJZ #cdnpoli #bcpoli
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer now saying that because of what the protesters are doing, the public doesn’t have access to this public area now either, only the protesters do. (Trenches & tripods across roads etc)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Judge Thompson: comes back at the RCMP lawyer asking if what RCMP are doing at #FairyCreek could be compared to police creating a cordon around the Downtown Eastside (DTES) in Vancouver, with stop searches and restricting materials.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
No one is really buying, I think including the Judge, that the RCMP are in danger from these protesters. https://t.co/3xoVo5JUvq
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
No one is really buying, I think including the Judge, that the RCMP are in danger from these protesters. https://t.co/3xoVo5JUvq
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
A delightful interlude from over at the Union of BC Mayors annual conference:
Sorry to briefly digress here, but this is going on right now at the @UBCM conference, where @jjhorgan is making his allegiances clearhttps://t.co/46PKkf2dHd
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Sorry to briefly digress here, but this is going on right now at the @UBCM conference, where @jjhorgan is making his allegiances clearhttps://t.co/46PKkf2dHd
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Agreed. https://t.co/oRPDAxg99G
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
RCMP lawyer is responding to the submissions of lawyer Matthew Nefstead for the #FairyCreek protesters who detailed RCMP actions, and she is saying but exclusions zones are different from day to day & change with the circumstances.
[Apparently!]
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I would agree with this assessment of what’s going on. pic.twitter.com/Qqy9Vpu0ok
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Thanks for these eyewitness observations of RCMP behaviour at #FairyCreek, @scribblechris. I’m attaching them to this thread: https://t.co/pY4MCUznl3
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Thanks for these eyewitness observations of RCMP behaviour at #FairyCreek, @scribblechris. I’m attaching them to this thread: https://t.co/pY4MCUznl3
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I don’t know if this lawyer for the crown/RCMP realizes how flimsy her case is), but she’s making a lot of mistakes, including this one. https://t.co/hkF1bqaYMf
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Now the lawyer is asking the judge not to listen to hearsay, which would imply he’d be inclined to do that. That’s thin ice. He shows restraint and says he is quite capable of filtering out hyperbole etc. but also that this cuts both ways. https://t.co/38S791gLgW
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Now the lawyer is asking the judge not to listen to hearsay, which would imply he’d be inclined to do that. That’s thin ice. He shows restraint and says he is quite capable of filtering out hyperbole etc. but also that this cuts both ways. https://t.co/38S791gLgW
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Now the lawyer is asking the judge not to listen to hearsay, which would imply he’d be inclined to do that. That’s thin ice. He shows restraint and says he is quite capable of filtering out hyperbole etc. but also that this cuts both ways. https://t.co/38S791gLgW
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Yes. Again, the crown is looking not just for an extension to the original injunction granted by Justice Verhoeven last spring; they are asking for even broader RCMP powers at #FairyCreek. #bcpoli #cdnpoli https://t.co/1GGNBvDGv1
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
And thanks for this photo @KjellLiem. Today the RCMP lawyer maintained that RCMP weren’t wearing badge ID numbers instead of nametags because ‘they don’t have standalone ID # badges’ – wrong. They evidently do. https://t.co/1ZOwjBKL2l #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
More on police taking arbitrary actions ie. exceeding their powers from a forest defender who was there at #FairyCreek: https://t.co/MaFM3MBm92 #fairycreekblockade
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Cont’d (and yes I detailed this earlier, including the unnecessary and unexplained destruction of a forest defender’s vehicle) https://t.co/8UuklJRlNH
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I would say this is a fair assessment. https://t.co/PLe6nx44cc
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
While court is on lunch, this report: #FairyCreek https://t.co/RbTJLbW2Aj
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
While court is on lunch, this report: #FairyCreek https://t.co/RbTJLbW2Aj
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Court is now resuming. This is the final afternoon of this injunction extension hearing; we are told it will conclude by 3:45.
They are looking at the affidavit containing video of protesters covered in mud. Lawyer for the protesters Elizabeth Strain will be responding
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
This will be the order of lawyers for the various forest defenders: Nefstead, Canning, Kelliher, Strain
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer Matthew Nefstead responding to A-G of Canada/RCMP lawyer Nygard’s submissions of this morning:
‘We don’t have evidence that those officers who do have numbered badges are wearing them, or that those who don’t will, once they receive theirs.’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer Matthew Nefstead responding to A-G of Canada/RCMP lawyer Nygard: – I may have misheard but think he said we need to hear whether police have been instructed not to wear badges or been instructed to
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer Matthew Nefstead responding to A-G of Canada/RCMP lawyer Nygard
Best example of unlawful media exclusions zones, which violate this same Judge’s order of August, is in the affidavits of Jackie Larkin & one other who were excluded
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer Matthew Nefstead –
AG lawyer says public access has been restored to previous enforcement areas but this is not true – RCMP may have moved on but those blocks now locked down by Teal Cedar, authorized by BC Min of Forests
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
‘Point is just that there are broader definitions of public access than what we are seeing at Fairy Creek’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer Matthew Nefstead is responding point by point to A-G of Canada/RCMP lawyer Nygard’s submission of this morning
‘We’re not asking you to adjudicate on each of these police actions m’lord, but the violence, whether court calls it justified or not is affecting rep of justice
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
..’and that these police actions right or wrong are resulting from the carrying out of the court’s injunction’ – in short, he’s suggesting I think that the injunction needs to be revisited
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Now lawyer Patrick Canning responding to A-G of Canada/RCMP lawyer Nygard’s submissions earlier
It doesn’t matter which type of police action we’re talking about, #FairyCreek, Edmonton or Vancouver DTES, it’s the same thing
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
..Defenders are afraid to give affidavits, they fear their vehicles being taken, they fear being added to threatened civil suits. Lots of evidence that people are afraid to give evidence because it might draw police attention to themselves esp during catch & release arrests
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Re ‘thin blue line patches. Court could take its traditional notice of the relationship between Indigenous people and the RCMP, who took children to residential schools & took them back there when they escaped, and see that thin blue line patches are inappropriate’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Thanks Steve, I spaced out and missed that point https://t.co/jtSTuG3VtU
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Canning: re: Robert (Saul) Arbess’ case: re: the Min of Forest submission y’day, (we are having a lot of trouble hearing right now – audio is garbled)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
There was a key point in there about a legal test that can be tried given new legislation (?) but it’s too garbled to hear – did anyone catch it?
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Canning: ‘I spoke to my client Pacheedaht Elder Bill Jones this a.m., a leader within this move’t, many protesters at #FairyCreek say they’re in TFL46 by his permission. Jones says they’ll stand down if Teal Cedar agrees to stop cutting #oldgrowth while this goes to mediation’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Steve Kelliher, lawyer for Robert (Saul) Arbess, one the forest defender side:
Judge Thompson apologizes for the timing of the case so close to the expiry date (says that part at least is not Teal Cedar’s fault)https://t.co/KHNy0FiQoW
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Steve Kelliher, lawyer for Robert (Saul) Arbess, one the forest defender side:
The statement “this is not working” is too mild for these events. What we have seen in the videos of RCMP actions is shocking.” #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
All of this reflects on the court tho it’s politicians who should be responsible here #FairyCreek
But what was most shocking about the videos of RCMP ripping masks off elderly woman & her daughter in order to pepper spray them, and the A-G’s lawyer can normalize this in court
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
It is shocking that ripping masks off an elderly woman so they can gas her is being normalized in British Columbia
You have authorities trying to compare these well-intentioned protestors to the January 6 rabble!
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
The public prosecution process does not direct the police. The crown counsel act puts daylight between the govt and police. The RCMP are under the power of the A-G who could tell the police to stay where they are right now. This is going to get serioushttps://t.co/EjErMSovkU…
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Kelliher warning that this is going to escalate and result in more serious injury or death. The fault ultimately lies with the politicians (federal and provincial) to call off the dogs.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Kelliher warning that this is going to escalate and result in more serious injury or death. The fault ultimately lies with the politicians (federal and provincial) to call off the dogs.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Now lawyer Elizabeth Strain for the forest defenders, responding to lawyer for A-G of Canada/RCMP: https://t.co/gWHGLcgLKh
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Sorry – Elizabeth Strain is responding to Dean Dalke here, the lawyer for Teal Cedar, as well as/instead of Ms Nygard lawyer for A-G of Canada/RCMP
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Elizabeth Strain: ‘lawyer for A-G complains that the protesters’ affidavits use “inflammatory language,” eg “it was shocking to see racism alive in the RCMP” (from seeing thin blue line & intimidation tactics)
It’s not inflammatory m’lord we need to hear what ppl think’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Lawyer for Teal Cedar, Dean Dalke, wants Elizabeth Strain to respond to a complaint about affidavit of Donna Clark one of her clients. Depicts a police raid on Heli Camp. Clark disputes that protesters disturb a “heli pad” (doesn’t exist) & debris is police not protester caused
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
RCMP left tarps all over the place, and helicopters land wherever there’s room, so the complaint that protesters have blocked a heli pad is false
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Now Strain responding to Teal Cedar complaints that protesters were naked. Strain says this is more attempt to demonize protesters. “Can’t get more stereotypical than that, and if Teal Cedar is upset by that (faint smile in voice) I’m sorry
NOTE: some wore mud. Not “feces”
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Teal Cedar’s lawyer saying that protesters claiming the mud on their bodies is feces creates problems for enforcement officers
Judge Thompson: ‘they’d have to be pretty credulous to believe that, no? They have noses’ (laughter in court)
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
That was funny and I didn’t see it coming https://t.co/6emj6H3t2L
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Judge Thompson: I will accept these affidavits and I’d like to say I appreciate all these lawyers here that we have not spent a week arguing admissibility of evidentiary materials and after 4 days I feel equipped to make a decision here’
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke: ‘The injunction has largely worked, and Teal Cedar has been able to do most of its logging work, and if the injunction extension is granted it can continue its work’https://t.co/HOenVSc88K
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke: going through legal precedents and questions of jurisdiction here. It’s going so fast into the legal weeds I’m losing the thread.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I think I’m hearing that the precedent is Justice McEwen on MacBlo vs. Simpson on an issue in the Slocan
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke is asking for Justice Thompson to go by the precedent and not let the injunction lapse, but to extend the injunction which would act to dissuade protesters.
Which I would agree is, in effect, this:
https://t.co/X0rf758ucE— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Judge Thompson: civil injunction is the remedy where A-G won’t enforce criminal law
Here is that case:https://t.co/ilvJmGyDZq
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Precisely and Judge Thompson is saying this is the cause of frustration.
Bec court is repeatedly tasked with doing bidding of companies and issuing injunctions where A-G doesn’t step in?https://t.co/En7JNYlM30
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke admits that enforcing these injunctions is not pretty
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Good point. https://t.co/cvNKI7ReZB
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke, lawyer for Teal Cedar, is actually arguing that if Judge Thompson doesn’t extend the injunction it will amount to condoning illegal acts of protesters. He seems to be drawing to a close
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke, lawyer for Teal Cedar, is actually arguing that if Judge Thompson doesn’t extend the injunction it will amount to condoning illegal acts of protesters. He seems to be drawing to a close
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke responding to Steven Kelliher and he’s discussing mandamus, saying it makes no sense for Teal Cedar to apply for it.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke responding to Steven Kelliher and he’s discussing mandamus, saying it makes no sense for Teal Cedar to apply for it.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
re mediation and mandamus https://t.co/IIfJ6wv7c0
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke: lawyer is focusing on “debris left on the road” and Teal Cedar’s concern that if they leave these materials they’ll be used to build new installations. https://t.co/z3YGtVQHKv
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke talking about some of the evidentiary materials including the contractor with the offensive shirt, removing people’s property, Teal Cedar says shirt’s unfortunate but not their responsibility
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Yes, I’m not going to cover all of this – going too quickly anyway. https://t.co/h6LP8PKXrJ
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke says Teal Cedar is legally entitled to tow the public’s vehicles and does it with RCMP oversight – he’s responding here to accusations that Teal Cedar is removing the public’s property unlawfully
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Dalke, lawyer for Teal Cedar, closing by urging judge to do something bold and while the public overwhelmingly oppose #oldgrowth logging, this is not a court of public opinion. #bcpoli #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Disappointingly, Judge Thompson just abruptly stated that the”status quo shall remain” ie injunction remains in place for now until he makes his decision in a few weeks.
Before the livefeed went dark a voice broke in saying”Shame on the A-G of Canada. Shame.” #FairyCreek
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
There’s that, and now we wait. https://t.co/MrhJv3GYH5
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Thanks so much to everyone who followed along, & who cares about #FairyCreek and more broadly our future & the state of our govts & justice system. Special thanks for invaluable reporting, commentary & comradely help from @SteveLloyd001 who made this easier and more fun.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Thanks so much to everyone who followed along, & who cares about #FairyCreek and more broadly our future & the state of our govts & justice system. Special thanks for invaluable reporting, commentary & comradely help from @SteveLloyd001 who made this easier and more fun.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
As everyone leaves BC Supreme Court in Nanaimo, there is drumming for #FairyCreek https://t.co/qu1dHFiUuD #bcpoli
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
This 4-day tweet of the #FairyCreek injunction case in BC Supreme Court began here. Sorry for its length, & thanks for joining us on this long voyage on the HMS Fairy Creek Livetweet. We’ll pick up again when Judge Thompson is back with a ruling. https://t.co/2e8jKSS3gA
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
I know I’m only one among many 1000s in BC who feel deep admiration & gratitude to all the #FairyCreek forest defenders. Despite being brutalized & traumatized they have doggedly, steadfastly kept their eyes on the prize. If you can go to #FairyCreek, do. If not, spread the word.
— Lindsay Brown (@Lidsville) September 17, 2021
Elder drums alongside Fairy Creek defenders outside BC Supreme Court in Nanaimo